The Vista bandwagon
- Xyon_of_Calhoun
- Guardsman
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:17 am
- Name: Xyon
- Race: Xenetian
The Vista bandwagon
I just did. I just wondered if anyone else had bothered.
I have to jump.
For even if I fall, for a moment, I will fly.
For even if I fall, for a moment, I will fly.
- Xyon_of_Calhoun
- Guardsman
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:17 am
- Name: Xyon
- Race: Xenetian
- Jenica Sabiny
- Citizen
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:29 am
- Race: Vampire
I haven't. I'm waiting to see how it runs on our work computers. They're switching over at some point, and I don't want to jump on that bandwagon without personally seeing what's in store.
Does anyone know: is it backwards compatible? I'd heard an ungly rumor that it's not, which is retarded and I hope is just an ugly rumor.
Does anyone know: is it backwards compatible? I'd heard an ungly rumor that it's not, which is retarded and I hope is just an ugly rumor.
- Xyon_of_Calhoun
- Guardsman
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:17 am
- Name: Xyon
- Race: Xenetian
Why would I willingly use up more RAM, more hard drive space, get annoying 'security' messages, potentially slow down most processes, potentially break many of my games, and support the advancement of that godawful operating system while getting absolutely no features that I will ever use or ever want to use?
No chance in hell.
If there was any reason at all to upgrade to vista that I could fathom, I might say there was a pig's chance in hell. But I still don't think there would be.
No chance in hell.
If there was any reason at all to upgrade to vista that I could fathom, I might say there was a pig's chance in hell. But I still don't think there would be.
The simple answer is "sort-of". It is -mostly- backward compatible, but that does not mean everything will work. In fact, Eve online only recently managed to get their game to work with Vista, and this has caused a slew of problems with no end to complaints.Jenica Sabiny wrote:Does anyone know: is it backwards compatible? I'd heard an ungly rumor that it's not, which is retarded and I hope is just an ugly rumor.
The world is an arena, not a stage. RP is a stage, not an arena.
-
Asiona & Lateus
- Citizen
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:51 am
Exactly as I've read and heard, Frug. I could get a free upgrade since I bought my computer "made for Vista" or some BS, but I didn't want to. XP is fine for what I want. I don't want all the fancy screens, I was annoyed with the "fanciness" of XP when it first came out. I prefer my computers utilitarian except for games, games should be pretty.
- Xyon_of_Calhoun
- Guardsman
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:17 am
- Name: Xyon
- Race: Xenetian
I still think it's faster. And to be honest, I had 256 MB of RAM under XP, which I later upgraded to 640 MB. I didn't see much improvement.
Installed Vista - I generally find I have 70% of my RAM free in standard desktop mode, and that is WITH the nifty sidebar and all the other slightly useless things Vista does.
Everything seems a lot faster in Vista, maybe that's just me seeing the benefits of my extra RAM but games load and play faster and smoother, apps like Firefox take mere seconds to load compared with agonising minutes under XP.
The only disadvantage I've found so far under Vista is the added HDD usage, and the added boot load times. Neither of which are particularly immense flaws with the OS. Overall, I like it a lot and would recommend it.
Normally, I hate MS. But I actually think they got something right with Vista. And well they should, really, since they had six extra years work on the fucking thing.
Installed Vista - I generally find I have 70% of my RAM free in standard desktop mode, and that is WITH the nifty sidebar and all the other slightly useless things Vista does.
Everything seems a lot faster in Vista, maybe that's just me seeing the benefits of my extra RAM but games load and play faster and smoother, apps like Firefox take mere seconds to load compared with agonising minutes under XP.
The only disadvantage I've found so far under Vista is the added HDD usage, and the added boot load times. Neither of which are particularly immense flaws with the OS. Overall, I like it a lot and would recommend it.
Normally, I hate MS. But I actually think they got something right with Vista. And well they should, really, since they had six extra years work on the fucking thing.
I have to jump.
For even if I fall, for a moment, I will fly.
For even if I fall, for a moment, I will fly.
-
Blood Ravenous
- Battlemage
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:23 pm
- Name: Ryxa
- Race: Human
- Xyon_of_Calhoun
- Guardsman
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:17 am
- Name: Xyon
- Race: Xenetian
